Re: Spiteful Negative Review Spam
Posted: Wed Jun 12, 2013 9:41 pm
are you saying I'm responding to the reviews with a picture of you bombing yourself ?
Fan-base Myth Development Community
https://tain.projectmagma.net/forum/
Well I know that PM do roughly the same to Myth 2, admittedly on a much larger scale, and then still credit Bungie for the games creation.Zaknafein wrote:Its funny because the only changes I made to the maps were to change unit trades or fix bugs left by the original makers! Seeing as you just admitted you haven't actually played the maps you can shut the fuck up, thanksOlong2 wrote:Don't know who "Aries" is, but my God was he spot on. His reviews of the "mapspam" were almost scholarly in detail and accuracy. I've seen a lot written about these ridiculous bastardized maps, but Aries, the dear man, takes the prize for depth, observation, and study. He's a giant. And, he's a hero.![]()
What would you know about my work, little boy?bluseychris2 wrote:Aries/Ares used to map with groups like Creation back in the day. Zak's map are bad hacks of other maps and the upload info makes it look like he's done serious work on it when he hasn't.
That's a shame.vinylrake wrote:The tone of 'Aries' doesn't sound anything like 'Ares'. Probably someone just used the name in an attempt to lend some cred to his comments, or just to try to stir up some controversy. Or both.Pyro wrote:We don't know if its the same user, as the names are spelling differently. Also, it's been a long time since Ares was around, as far as I know.
So what is your definition of a map hack?bluseychris2 wrote:
Well I know that PM do roughly the same to Myth 2, admittedly on a much larger scale, and then still credit Bungie for the games creation.
I'm also 30 and have seen many a bad map hack in my time.
Looks like someone still doesn't want to man up to his suiciding, what a mature and upstanding member of the community LOLGodzFire wrote:Again, you're not trying to address the actual issues and instead deflecting. I don't feel like starting a huge back and forth with this so all I'm saying is maybe consider addressing the issues brought up instead of doing something else.